HOME
> Submission
Submission Info
1. Submit a full paper for publication and presentation
Manuscripts can be submitted by one of the authors both in Word and PDF format of at least 5 pages through either our Online Submission System or email to finalpaper12@outlook.com
Authors must follow the template below very carefully before submitting their articles. Particular attention must be paid to the authors' names and affiliations in order to avoid any erratum in the future.
At least one of the paper authors is requested to attend the conference to present the paper. Oral presentation or poster presentation can be chosen by the authors.
PLAGIARISM of any kind is prohibited, and similarity index should not be more than 20%.
The authors should ensure that the submitted articles have not been published elsewhere and are not currently under consideration by another conference.
The corresponding author takes the responsibility and ensures that the submitted article has beenapproved by all the co-authors.
It is also the responsibility of the author to certify that the articles coming from a particular institution are submitted with necessary approval.
The accepted papers must be revised, taking into consideration the referees' comments and suggestions, before inclusion in the conference proceedings.
2. Submit an abstract for presentation only
Abstract submission for presentation only without publication (300-500 words).
If an oral presentation or poster presentation is requested without full paper publication, please submit the abstract only to us through email to finalpaper12@outlook.com.
Review Process
Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in ACAAI 2026 are sent to two or more expert reviewers. The conference follows a double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other's identity. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of editors, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers' comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.
- ❖
1. Manuscript Allocation：Within one week after submission, the Editor-in-Chief assigns each manuscript to 2–3 independent reviewers with expertise aligned to the paper’s topic. Reviewers must declare no conflicts of interest (e.g., collaborations, institutional affiliations, or financial ties with authors) prior to participation.
- ❖
2. Initial Screening (1 week)：Reviewers conduct a preliminary check for compliance with formatting guidelines, structural completeness (abstract, methods, results, etc.), and thematic relevance. Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards are desk-rejected, with detailed feedback provided to authors.
- ❖
3. In-Depth Evaluation (3 weeks)：Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological validity, data integrity, and contribution to the field. Evaluations include:
• A categorical rating (Accept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject)
• Constructive comments for improvement
• A confidential recommendation to the Editor
- ❖
4. Decision-Making & Conflict Resolution：The Editor consolidates reviews and resolves discrepancies through panel discussions. Final decisions prioritize both scholarly rigor and a target acceptance rate of 40%, which balances selectivity with support for emerging research. Borderline manuscripts may undergo additional review or statistical validation.
- ❖
5. Author Notification：Authors receive a decision within 1-week post-review, including reviewer comments. Accepted manuscripts proceed to production; others may be invited to resubmit after revision (2-month revision).
- ❖
6. Revisions & Appeals：Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated within 2 weeks. Authors may appeal decisions with a point-by-point rebuttal, which triggers an independent audit by the Editorial Board.
Review Criteria
1. Originality and Innovation: Is the paper presenting new ideas, methodologies, or findings? Does it contribute to the advancement of the field?
2. Technical Soundness: Are the methods used sound and appropriate? Is the analysis rigorous? Are the results well-supported by the data?
3. Relevance to the Conference: Does the paper fit within the scope of the conference themes and tracks?
4. Clarity and Organization: Is the paper well-organized, with clear arguments and structure? Are the ideas presented in a coherent and understandable way?
5. Literature Review and References: Does the paper appropriately engage with existing literature? Is there a clear understanding of the state of the field?
6. Ethical Considerations: Does the research adhere to ethical standards, especially in areas like data privacy, human subjects, etc.?
7. Practical Implications: For applied research, reviewers will also assess the potential practical impact or applications of the findings.
8. Each of these criteria is typically scored on a numerical scale (e.g., 1-5), and reviewers are asked to provide detailed feedback and suggestions for improvement.
Editorial Policies
Papers submitted to the conference should report your original work, unpublished before. They could be either experimental or theoretical and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtue of any academics. Any act of plagiarism or self-plagiarism is unacceptable and academic misconduct will not be tolerated. If an author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, we will reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications. Fabrication of data is an egregious departure from the expected norms of scientific conduct, as is the selective reporting of data with the intent to mislead or deceive, as well as the theft of data or research results from others.
Generative AI Policy
Authors who use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies (AI tools) in the writing of a manuscript, production of images or graphical elements of the paper, or in the collection and analysis of data, must be transparent in disclosing in the manuscript which AI tool was used and how it was used. Authors are fully responsible for the content of their submitted manuscript, including any parts produced by an AI tool, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics. The specific AI tool used, and its purpose should be described in the Methods or Acknowledgments section.
Download the Guideline for AI Tools
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
- ❖
Title and Author Information: It should include Paper Title, Names of all the Authors with their full institutional mailing addresses and email addresses.
- ❖
Abstract: The manuscript must contain an abstract. The abstract should be citation-free and should not exceed 400 words.
- ❖
Introduction: Introduction should be concise and must present sufficient introduction and motivation behind the topic under study.
- ❖
Materials and Methods: This section describes detail the procedures adopted in the study. This section maybe divided into subsections for its better structuring, if there are more than one methods.
- ❖
Results and Discussion: This section presents the outcome of the study and may be divided into subsections.
- ❖
Conclusions: This section must concisely and clearly explain the main conclusions of the study highlighting its importance and relevance.
- ❖
Acknowledgments: Acknowledgments (if any) can be included before the references and may includesupporting grants, funding agencies, and so on.
- ❖
References: It is the responsibility of authors to ensure that each cited references are complete and accurate.
- ❖
Figures: All the figures must be prepared with high resolution and embedded within PDF/WORD file. Authors are supposed to embed all figures and tables in PDF/WORD file of the manuscript. However, authors may be asked to provide the source files of the figures, if needed.
- ❖
Preparation of Tables: Tables should be created using manuscript preparation software (e.g. MS-Word) and cited within text. Each table should have a Table number and descriptive title.
- ❖
Copyright: The conference papers are copyrighted by the publishing house.
- ❖
Disclosure Policy: Authors must disclose any possible conflict of interest in their manuscripts. If there is no conflict of interest exists, authors should state that "The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper."